| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Gromik Originally by: Ephemeron Quote: Safe the BO @36AU safe spot. warp 25 bombers 30km off jammer. cloak. More like: Safe the BO @36AU safe spot. warp 25 bombers 30km off jammer. cloak. ..DDD warp pod to s...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.31 20:31:00
|
2. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Alex Harumichi Originally by: Vall Kor Because a BS can't carry light drones? Ummm, what? I just said that drones are pretty much the only defense a bs has against the new bombers. and which BS does NOT h...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.31 14:00:00
|
3. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
stealth bomber nerf and another ECM nerf incomming ... glad my subscription ends today ... don't have to get angry about the idiotic proposals here ... --- SIG --- CSM: your support is needed !
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.31 13:55:00
|
4. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis comments on keeping the stealth bomber in its current role It is understandable that those of you who have found a good niche and strategy for the stealth bombers and sniping have met with some success and a...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.31 13:30:00
|
5. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Talaan Stardrifter On a Good Note , Missiles now successfully damage their targets even if their origin has cloaked. well yes, because max skilled torpedo has flight time of 11 seconds. It was known before that for...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.31 13:01:00
|
6. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Merin Ryskin Ok, this is much better, but still needs some work. Quote: 1. Bombers will be able to fit covert ops cloak However they will have a 30 second cloak reactivation delay. This means they can warp in clo...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.31 12:08:00
|
7. Stealth Bombers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Hugh Ruka on 30/03/2009 09:27:18 1. cocd - iDONTCARE(tm) ... cloaked velocity bonus is ok 2. FIX DA BOMBS !!! the best thing you can do for SBs is to fix the bombs and bomblaunshers. If you want to create a close range, suicide ant...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.30 09:25:00
|
8. ECM Ships - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Merin Ryskin You know what's really hilarious, in a sad way? Everyone is complaining about the Falcon in solo and small-gang fights , the fleet pilots just insta-pop them with sniper battleships/HACs. And guess what these...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.26 11:54:00
|
9. Gas Clouds and Cloak - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I wonder why the gas/dust cloud actualy decloaks you but meh ... --- SIG --- CSM: your support is needed !
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.15 15:49:00
|
10. Scanning problem ( probes too week without covert-ops bonus ) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Random Caldari Edited by: Random Caldari on 13/03/2009 15:33:16 Originally by: Space Wanderer Edited by: Space Wanderer on 13/03/2009 15:22:02 Edited by: Space Wanderer on 13/03/2009 15:20:15 Origina...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.13 15:53:00
|
11. Module queues being deactivated by unsuccessful lock attempts - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Major Stallion Originally by: Zo5o I didn't see anything about this in the patch notes, and cntl-click spam has been part of the game for a long time now... can't see it being called an exploit. im talking about ...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.12 13:21:00
|
12. w-hole space mechanic intended? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tresten Remu Hi, since Apocrypha was introduced on Sisi I am thinking more and more about following scenario. To get into the same w-hole space is indeed difficult because there are many systems with possible entry points. ...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.12 10:14:00
|
13. Scanning for drones just became no fun and too time consuming - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Chips nBeans once you learn the probe controls you can scan anything down in 5-10 minutes. You just havnt got the hang of it yet. Even when I had only just started using the system on sisi it took me 25mins, after practisin...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.12 10:13:00
|
14. Bubbles on wormholes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
wspace is 0.0 in the sense that there are no CONCORD restrictions ... howver it is different (like the ones that do weird things to your ship). so I see no objections for wormholes to interfere with warp scramble technology ... same way they could...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.12 10:08:00
|
15. wormhole campers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Hugh Ruka on 12/03/2009 08:02:01 funny how "use a scout" becomes highly inefficient if the scout is not a prober ship :-) I mean the delayed local shows its benefits ... (/me covops scout for hire) --- SIG --- CSM: your support i...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.12 08:02:00
|
16. Scanning for drones just became no fun and too time consuming - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
yeah I enjoyed dron scavenging some time ago too ... was very please when I found a wing of abandoned garde IIs :-) not so fun anymore ... takes too much time and too much effort ... --- SIG --- CSM: your support is needed !
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.12 07:54:00
|
17. wormhole campers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
let Sleepers sweep wormholes once in a while ... will be fun to watch as campers get a nice spawn surprise --- SIG --- CSM: your support is needed !
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.11 14:35:00
|
18. ROF Rigs? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
check the stats in EFT current and compare to Sisi ... or compare to Apo TQ ... --- SIG --- CSM: your support is needed !
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.09 07:39:00
|
19. Offensive Subsystems - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: But Sects I'd like someone to explain something to me. Why is it that the only race to get 3 bonuses to their offensive modules is Amarr, with their lasers? Well the third bonus is cap use right.. cause Amarr need that bon...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.05 10:28:00
|
20. Changes discussed with Zulupark - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Zulupark Ok, so here's where things stand: Currently over the past months the devs have been busy working on Apocrypha and so far there hasn't been a lot of revisiting old systems or rebalancing. However those things (e...
- by Hugh Ruka - at 2009.03.05 10:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |